Impact of anesthetic management on catheter ablation for premature ventricular complexes: insights during the COVID-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: The influence of divergent anesthesia types during ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is not known. While previously performed under general anesthesia (GA) at our institution, these procedures were exclusively performed under local anesthesia (LA) ± minimal sedation during the COVID-19 outbreak for logistic reasons. METHODS: One hundred and eight consecutive patients (82 GA versus 26 LA) undergoing PVC ablation at our center were evaluated. Intraprocedural PVC burden (over 3 min) pre-ablation was measured twice: (1) at the start (before GA induction) and (2) before catheter insertion (after GA induction). Upon cessation of ablation and after a waiting period of ≥ 15 min, acute ablation success (AAS) was defined as absence of PVCs until the end of the recording period. RESULTS: Intraprocedural PVC burden was not significantly different between LA versus GA group: (1) 17.8 ± 3% vs 12.7 ± 2%, P = 0.17 and (2) 10.0 ± 3% vs 7.4 ± 1%, P = 0.43, respectively. Activation mapping-based ablation was performed significantly more in the LA vs GA group (77% vs 26% of patients, P < 0.001, respectively). AAS was significantly higher in LA vs GA group: 22/26 (85%) vs 41/82 (50%), respectively, P < 0.01. After multivariable analysis, LA was the only independent predictor for AAS (OR 13, 95% CI 1.57-107.4, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Ablation of PVC under LA presented significantly higher AAS rate compared to GA. The procedure under GA might be complicated by PVC inhibition (after catheter insertion/during mapping) and PVC disinhibition post-extubation.

Targeted Treatment of Inappropriate Sinoatrial Node Tachycardia Based on Electrophysiological and Structural Mechanisms.

The purpose of this review is to determine the causal mechanisms and treatment of inappropriate sinoatrial tachycardia (IST), defined as a non-physiological elevation in resting heart rate. IST is defined as a resting daytime sinus rate >100 beats/minute and an average 24-hour heart rate >90 beats/minute. Potential causal mechanisms include sympathetic receptor hypersensitivity, blunted parasympathetic tone, or enhanced intrinsic automaticity within the sinoatrial node (SAN) pacemaker-conduction complex. These anomalies may coexist in the same patient. Recent ex-vivo near-infrared transmural optical imaging of the SAN in human and animal hearts provides important insights into the functional and molecular features of this complex structure. In particular, it reveals the existence of preferential sinoatrial conduction pathways that ensure robust SAN activation with electrical conduction. The mechanism of IST is debated because even high-resolution electroanatomical mapping approaches cannot reveal intramural conduction in the 3-dimensional SAN complex. It may be secondary to enhanced automaticity, intranodal re-entry, or sinoatrial conduction pathway re-entry. Different pharmacological approaches can target these mechanisms. Long-acting ß blockers in IST can act on both primarily increased automaticity and dysregulated autonomic system. Ivabradine targets sources of increased SAN automaticity. Conventional or hybrid ablation may target all the described abnormalities. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of putative IST mechanisms. In conclusion, based on current knowledge, pharmacological and ablation approaches for IST, including the novel hybrid SAN sparing ablation, are discussed.

Incidence and Predictors of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients With COVID-19.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a systemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Arrhythmias are frequently associated with COVID-19 and could be the result of inflammation or hypoxia. This study aimed to define the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with COVID-19 and to correlate arrhythmias with pulmonary damage assessed by computed tomography (CT). Methods: All consecutive patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis hospitalized at Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Belgium, between March 2020 and May 2020, were screened. All included patients underwent a thorax CT scan and a CT severity score, a semiquantitative scoring system of pulmonary damage, was calculated. The primary endpoint was the arrhythmia occurrence during follow-up. Results: In this study, 100 patients were prospectively included. At a mean follow-up of 19.6 months, 25 patients with COVID-19 (25%) experienced 26 arrhythmic episodes, including atrial fibrillation in 17 patients, inappropriate sinus tachycardia in 7 patients, atrial flutter in 1 patient, and third-degree atrioventricular block in 1 patient. No ventricular arrhythmias were documented. Patients with COVID-19 with arrhythmias showed more often need for oxygen, higher oxygen maximum flow, longer QTc at admission, and worse damage at CT severity score. In univariate logistic regression analysis, significant predictors of the primary endpoint were: the need for oxygen therapy (odds ratio [OR] 4.59, 95% CI 1.44-14.67, p = 0.01) and CT severity score of pulmonary damage (OR per 1 point increase 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a consecutive cohort of patients with COVID-19 the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias was 25%. The need for oxygen therapy and CT severity score were predictors of arrhythmia occurrence during follow-up.